Showing posts with label television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label television. Show all posts

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Another casting call

I was contacted by an assistant producer at Blast! Films seeking families looking to move from an urban to a rural environment for a film documentary. I am posting the relevant information but I do not have any additional details. Any questions will need to be directed to Tom Evans at Tevans@blastfilms.co.uk
_____________________________________


I’m contacting you with regards to a new feel-good network series following ordinary families who want to escape city-life to peaceful off-grid living in the glorious American wilderness. Each show will feature one family viewing three featured properties with a view to buy and they will spend a few days getting a taste of life unplugged from the urban mayhem.

I’m looking for normal families from various backgrounds for the series, and for the pilot (now in production) we really want to feature some stunning properties but we need to find the right family/budget before we can start looking for locations. Most importantly, this is a warm and supportive series; we hope to give the family a taste of the good life and inspire the audience to get back to nature.


This is an excellent time to be making this, as I’m sure you are aware interest in living off-grid has never been greater and continues to grow. The series will offer a great opportunity to show-off some fantastic properties and scenery on-top of the human benefits of country living and I’m hoping you would be interested in speaking with me about this further.

Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or would like more information. It would also be a great help if you’d forward on this post to any families who’re thinking of heading off the beaten track and you think might enjoy this experience.

Thomas Evans
Assistant Producer
Blast! Films
Imperial Works, Perren Street
London NW5 3ED
T: +44 20 7424 8036
M: +44 77 2766 9842
www.blastfilms.co.uk

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Casting call

In January 2012, I posted a casting call for a production company called TwoFour America that is interested in filming a docu-drama illustrating the American dream of becoming self-sufficient on a homestead. Yesterday I received a follow-up email requesting one more family to fulfill their casting call. I am posting this press release but have no further information. Any questions will need to be directed to the email: bigdreamcasting@gmail.com
__________________________________

NOW CASTING

Families who are ready to ditch the rat race and get back to the simple life.

A major cable network is currently looking for strong Moms and Dads who are planning to lead their families in a move to an off-grid dwelling in a remote part of the country.

Is your relationship with your partner suffering because of the pressure of jobs and childcare? Are your kids spending more time on computers than with each other? Are you ready to take a huge step to change that?

If you are preparing to turn in your briefcase for a backpack or your styling tools for a tool belt, this could be the opportunity for you to share your journey!

We want to hear from Moms and Dads who have 2 or more children over the age of 10, who are ready to sell everything and move to a different part of the country.

Please email names and ages of all family members, contact information, photos and a brief description of your story to: bigdreamcasting@gmail.com

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Hollywood vs. Real America

There is a television series that's just hit the prime time called (pardon my language) Good Christian Bitches (later modified to Good Christian Belles after the understandable outcry). It's made by the creators of "Sex and the City," so I guess that tells you something. We don't have television reception so I've never seen this latest example of Hollywood art, but I gather the basic premise is to show how Christian women are nothing but a bunch of biblical hypocrites. Ha ha -- it's so amusing, don't you think, to watch women be catty? And placing them in a church environment just seals the deal, in the opinion of Hollywood.

(Just as an aside, imagine a Hollywood brainchild called "Good Jewish Bitches" or "Good Muslim Bitches" and see how quickly the producers would get flayed. But hey, it's open season on Christians.)

This show is apparently full of splendid advice, such as "cleavage lets your cross hang straight" and other useful suggestions.


As I see it, this is just the latest example of Hollywood's absolute disdain for Middle America and its values. I was going to link to a trailer to demonstrate my point, but after watching it I didn't want my girls to see the shocking content, so I found another, slightly less racy trailer (here). And keep that in mind: the first trailer I found was so shocking I didn't want my girls to see it... yet this show is now on prime time television, where young people all over America can hear the catty language and watch the degrading situations played out in this sitcom.


As with any television show, the actors and actresses involved are drop-dead beautiful. But what good is all that beauty if its purpose is to ridicule and scorn an enormous segment of our nation? Its whole essence is the mockery of values, particularly Christian values. Such ideals as modesty and chastity are held in contempt as unattainable and unrealistic (and unnecessary) goals. The nuclear family is shown as dysfunctional (of course) and a source of oppression for women (of course). It's considered "empowering" for women to dress like skanks and seduce men away from their marriage vows. It's sole purpose, apparently, is to illustrate (with the help of lots of cleavage) how religion is bad.

But no one ever talks about how religion is good -- how many lives have been turned around, how many overwhelmed people have found solace, how many challenges have been overcome because of faith (and this doesn't even examine how many souls are saved).

What it comes down to is Hollywood's persistent ambition to demonstrate how secular life is vastly superior to religious life. The pious are hypocrites and idiots. All devout church-goers are in reality closet deviants bent on fulfilling their animal urges. And somehow, in some way, Christian values are to blame for it all.

Now this petty and superficial television show is moving into the prime time, where countless numbers of young people, whose faith may still be fragile, will fall under its outwardly-beautiful and glamorous sway.

So anyway, this morning I was writing this blog piece and getting on my high horse when I got bumped down to earth by a sobering piece written by columnist Dennis Prager. It seems he and his wife, who are traveling in Australia, met a young waitress from Iran who was raised Muslim. Due to the violence she saw around her while growing up, she now considers herself an atheist.

"Nothing produces atheists like despicable religious people," writes Prager. "They do far more harm to religious faith than all the atheist writers and activists in the world put together."

This statement made me wince because there are far too many times when Christians are seen in a similar light. While I can't go into details, let's just say I'm in a position to see a LOT of chatter back and forth between the political left and the political right, between atheists and Christians, between progressives and conservatives. Many people will claim that conservatives are more verbally restrained than the name-calling and vitriol that marks the left; but I'm here to tell you it ain't necessarily so. There is just as much mud-slinging, name-calling, and nasty language coming from so-called Christians; and it serves to reinforce every bad opinion atheists could ever hold of us.

As a Christian I am held to high standards, standards I continuously fail to meet (which is where forgiveness of my sins is so comforting). Nonetheless those standards are there, and I must strive toward them. I must guard my tongue and my (typing) fingers from falling into the classic human failings of gossip, name-calling, and hypocrisy. In other words, I -- and every other person who calls him or herself a Christian -- must be ambassadors for our faith. We must represent the goodness and mercy of Jesus, not the gossip and slander that GCB illustrates.

I'll fail, of course. But at least I have a Higher Authority to whom I can lift my fallen eyes and beg forgiveness.

But you still won't catch me watching Good Christian "Belles" any time soon.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Calling all homesteaders!!!!!

Attention all wanna-be homesteaders!

I am bringing to your attention what could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Yes that sounds dramatic, so let me explain. This is a long post, but I think an exciting one, so hang onto your hats.

Last month I, along with many other rural-themed bloggers, received an email as follows:

I came across your blog while doing research for a TV production company. We are developing a show and it's still in the very early stages, and right now we are castings our nets far and wide looking for characters. Here is the official casting notice:

Raw TV, the makers of the hit shows Gold Rush and Locked Up Abroad, are searching for individuals to feature as part of a new series for a major cable television network. Do you have the spirit of an American pioneer? Are you fed up with the world you live in today and imagine another - better - way to live? Do you and your family and friends ever talk about leaving society we know it, leaving it all behind and building a new world off the grid, with the frontier grit of your forefathers? If you are passionate about your beliefs and would be willing to share them with a national TV audience we would love to talk to you.

If this sounds like you, whether you have a plan in action, have a more long term dream or are already living out on the frontier, please email your contact details and a brief description of your situation to casting@rawtelevision.co.uk


Of course I immediately looked at their webpage, located here.


Frankly my first thought was this was a scam of some sort. Over the years I’ve been contacted by various and sundry shady-sounding organizations and this seemed no different. However I emailed back and asked for additional information. Bottom line, last month I had a delightful hour-long chat with a fellow named Adam Loeb out of New York City. (Raw TV has both British and American offices.)

Looks like this is legit, folks. And that’s where the once-in-a-lifetime bit arises.

This is the gist of what Adam explained. They’re looking to cast ordinary folks into an extraordinary situation, namely leaving the city and moving to a homestead. The “pioneer” term in the casting call mentioned above is not quite accurate. As Adam explained, “pioneer” has a slightly different meaning in Britain than it does in America. I suggested he substitute the term “homesteader” into future casting calls for a more accurate description.

I explained to Adam the differences between historical and modern homesteaders. Historically, homesteaders were those participating in the Homestead Act of 1862 which opened up the American West. Modern homesteaders, by contrast, are those interested in becoming as self-sufficient and independent as possible. They farm to feed their families and perhaps have a little surplus to trade or sell, but their livelihood isn’t farming.

Most modern homesteaders are NOT farmers. Farmers engage in agriculture for purposes of profit. I know many people who farm for a living. Their business is to produce a crop and sell it, and that’s their job. Most homesteaders don’t “farm” for a living; they merely produce food for their own family and usually bring in income through a regular job and/or a home business.

Anyway, back to the TV show. Adam is looking for people who want to homestead, but for whatever reasons haven’t yet taken that leap. He’s looking for people with a passionate interest and some mental and/or physical preparation to live a rural, self-sufficient lifestyle. (In short, Adam is looking for Don and I the way we were twenty years ago, LOL.)

Raw TV recently produced a documentary series for the Discovery Channel called Gold Rush Alaska which followed several men seeking gold in the Yukon. It was a very popular series, Adam said, and now they’re trying to develop a new show which depicts people attempting to launch themselves into rural life, and documenting all the trials and tribulations and beauty and successes they may experience.


The concept is still not fully developed, so at this point things are flexible. But the next step is to start casting, and that’s the exciting part.

Adam stressed this is not a contest-based reality program where participants get X amount of money for “surviving” six months in the wilderness, or whatever. Nor will they be artificially pairing up incompatible participants, such as putting hippies together with militia folks. Nothing artificial like that.

Rather, this is an unfolding docu-drama, illustrating the American dream to become self-sufficient on a homestead. It will document the challenges inherent in building a life in the wilderness.

I asked where this would take place. Would participants be required to leave home and try homesteading at a location of the producer’s choice?

Adam said no; the location is not fixed, but it needs to be in a “visually dynamic” location such as Idaho, Montana, British Columbia, or something like that. Their preference is in the Pacific Northwest, Montana, or Idaho. He prefers to cast someone with an interest in settling in a wild area that has the potential to support a farmable homestead.

Adam was quite clear about the kind of person(s) they’re seeking. Participants should be planning on making this move to begin with. They’re looking for people who have passionately yearned for a homesteading lifestyle but just haven’t quite taken the plunge. In other words, they’re NOT looking for patently unqualified people who will fail. Rather, they’re seeking someone who will be happy to keep living out their self-sufficient dream life long after the cameras stop rolling.

I asked if participants would be expected to live a “pioneer” lifestyle, i.e. oil lamps and hand pumps and outhouses; or can they utilize modern means to get things done, such as tractors and power tools. He said participants absolutely will use modern methodologies. They’re not looking to re-create the 1850s; they’re looking to document how modern people set themselves up to be self-sufficient.

Adam knows that not many participants will have actual experience in homesteading, but he wants people to succeed. Therefore participants should possess useful skills (or the willingness to learn useful skills) to get them started on a homestead. In other words, if your most useful skill is shopping at the mall and gossiping on your smart phone, you’re probably not the best choice.

Adam asked me what kinds of people are most likely to fail in a project like this. I thought for a moment, then replied, “Those who think country living will be flawless, simple, and easy. The ones who think, ‘How hard can it be?’ The ones who think living in the country is all peace and love and universal harmony.” I said that country living is NOT simple, but it IS worth it. I said that homesteaders must expect to face the good, the bad, and the ugly. They must sometimes make decisions about their livestock which may be seen as cruel by urban standards (such as castrating a calf or butchering an injured animal). The ones who fail are the ones who don’t want to fence their garden against all those pretty deer, then don’t understand why their organic vegetables won’t grow.

But the ones who succeed have a willingness to face sometimes harsh reality, who don’t have an artificially rosy view of country living, and who don’t mind working hard and getting sweaty and dirty. Nor are they afraid to make mistakes.

Since this is TV, they’re also looking for “dynamic” people. I asked what he meant by “dynamic.” Apparently it has nothing to do with physical attraction, but rather everything to do with charisma and the ability not to be flat, monotone, and boring in front of a camera.

I asked what incentives or compensation participants can expect. This is still up in the air. The compensation and/or incentives will depend on the final format and direction of the show. They’re willing to consider things that might help the participants get started. They don’t want to interfere with or manipulate the natural progression of a developing homestead, except insofar as assisting with something big. (Yes, at this point it’s that vague.)

I asked about what participants can expect as far as filming. Will they have a film crew dogging their heels 24/7? Adam explained the whole project is still being formulated, so how this docu-drama will be filmed is still up for discussion.

One idea, Adam said, is to find multiple families to come together in the same location. They definitely need more than one family to participate, but whether it is a random collection of strangers, or a band of friends who already had plans to move, is still open.

Whew. Is this a bizarre and exciting twist, or what?

At any rate, if you’re interested in this developing opportunity, you’ll need to send an email stating your interest, qualifications, and goals to:

Adam Loeb
casting@rawtelevision.co.uk

If you apply because you’re reading this post, please tell them you got the information from me on Rural Revolution. In other words, somewhere in your email you should state, “I saw this information on Patrice Lewis’s Rural Revolution blog.” This way they’ll know where people got their information. (Besides, I told Adam I’ll be fascinated to watch this project unfold.)

Okay folks, now’s the time to do some serious thinking! And keep me posted!

Friday, October 29, 2010

Creating zombies

I know some people whose twelve year old son who is very nearly functionally illiterate. I am frequently in a position to hear him read out loud, and it's like listening to a seven-year-old read. It's so painful to listen that I don't ask him to read out loud very much.

The sad thing is, this boy's mother is a highly-respected schoolteacher.

There's nothing wrong with this boy's intelligence. He's a little hyperactive, sure, but no more than any typical active kid. I was raised with three brothers, and active boys don't bother me.

No, as I see it this boy can barely read because there are so few books in the house, but enormous amounts of media.

A huge television is in a prominent location in the living room. There is another television in the parent's bedroom. A third television - drum roll please - is in the bedroom of this boy and his older brother.  They also have every electronic whiz-bang toy on the market - GameBoys and X-boxes and too many other things to list.


Blitzed with so much passive media, what kid in his right mind would choose the more active activity of reading?

Sadly, this is not an uncommon situation. Quite the opposite. Children are so regularly blitzed with television and other media that they do little else during their waking hours. And rather than chastising parents for using the damned idiot box as a babysitter, articles are printed that merely call for increased quality in children's programming. Grrrr.

The horrifying thing about television is it is the single-most preventable barrier to intelligence. Children who grow up without television, or with television severely restricted, are (ahem) forced to DO things. They build forts in the back yard and cities with blocks. They dream. They read. They imagine. They live in a make-believe world that is NOT populated by TV cartoon characters. All of these necessary and critical play habits later translate into intelligence.

But none of this is possible if the poor kid is turned into a zombie by his own parents.


Contrary to the actions of advocacy groups that lobby for higher-quality children's television programming, it's not the quality of programming that's the issue here (quality is a whole different issue!); it's the quantity. While children are watching television, they aren't doing anything else.


They sure as heck aren't reading.They aren't interacting with real people. They aren't learning critical social skills. Instead, they grow up thinking all the world's problems should be solvable within a half hour (the length of a sitcom) because that's all they've ever seen. As they get older, they're also sucked into video games, electronic toys, computers, and other media. And they never read books. They grow up to be virtually illiterate.

I confess I find it almost physically nauseating to see children strung out in front of a television, slack-jawed. It's worse when it involves babies and toddlers.

I remember an incident when our Oldest Daughter was about four months old. I went to a local laundromat to wash some sleeping bags. Older Daughter, of course, was with me, and I laid a blanket across the folding table while the washing machines hummed and we played little games. Another man was in the laundromat as well, and we got to talking. He and his wife also had a baby about the same age, he told me. But - and this was said with a certain amount of pride - his wife liked to put the baby in a wind-up swing in front of the television.

At four months.


I believe parents are doing a horrible disservice to their children by encouraging constant exposure to media. Rather than channeling my friend's son's hyperactivity into sports, they pacified him with television. (To their everlasting credit, they haven't drugged him with Ritalin.)

Many years ago I saw a magazine ad that was so awful it stopped me in my tracks.

The ad featured two children staring, zombie-like, in a darkened room at a television. In bold letters below the children was the word "HELP."

At first I thought, “Good. Someone is trying to break those poor kids loose from the grip of the stupid television.”

Then I read the text of the ad:

“The average American child spends close to four hours a day planted in front of a television. Which is why [name of company] is happy to sponsor the [name of an “educational” television series]. Charming characters present classic, positive stories that help you guide your children through the kinds of lessons you actually want them to learn. Courage. Honesty. Responsibility. After all, what better place to reach your children than right where they already are.”

Does anyone else find this logic sickening?

No expectation that the parents should actually take responsibility for their own children’s moral teachings. God forbid that you should have to interact with the little tykes. Instead, stick ’em in front of the TV and turn their brains to mush so you don’t have to be bothered.

These TV shows are supposed to teach responsibility (and courage and honesty) when the kids’ parents aren’t even willing to have the courage and honesty to take responsibility themselves? Huh?

The single best expression of my aversion to television and children was a poem written by Roald Dahl, author of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Matilda, and other great books. It goes as follows:

TELEVISION

The most important thing we've learned,
So far as children are concerned,
Is never, NEVER, NEVER let
Them near your television set --
Or better still, just don't install
The idiotic thing at all.

In almost every house we've been,
We've watched them gaping at the screen.
They loll and slop and lounge about,
And stare until their eyes pop out.
(Last week in someone's place we saw
A dozen eyeballs on the floor.)

They sit and stare and stare and sit
Until they're hypnotised by it,
Until they're absolutely drunk
With all that shocking ghastly junk.

Oh yes, we know it keeps them still,
They don't climb out the window sill,
They never fight or kick or punch,
They leave you free to cook the lunch
And wash the dishes in the sink --
But did you ever stop to think,
To wonder just exactly what
This does to your beloved tot?

IT ROTS THE SENSE IN THE HEAD!
IT KILLS IMAGINATION DEAD!
IT CLOGS AND CLUTTERS UP THE MIND!
IT MAKES A CHILD SO DULL AND BLIND
HE CAN NO LONGER UNDERSTAND
A FANTASY, A FAIRYLAND!
HIS BRAIN BECOMES AS SOFT AS CHEESE!
HIS POWERS OF THINKING RUST AND FREEZE!
HE CANNOT THINK -- HE ONLY SEES!

'All right!' you'll cry. 'All right!' you'll say,
'But if we take the set away,
What shall we do to entertain
Our darling children? Please explain!'

We'll answer this by asking you,
'What used the darling ones to do?
'How used they keep themselves contented
Before this monster was invented?'
Have you forgotten? Don't you know?
We'll say it very loud and slow:

THEY ... USED ... TO ... READ! They'd READ and READ,
AND READ and READ, and then proceed
To READ some more. Great Scott! Gadzooks!
One half their lives was reading books!

The nursery shelves held books galore!
Books cluttered up the nursery floor!
And in the bedroom, by the bed,
More books were waiting to be read!

Such wondrous, fine, fantastic tales
Of dragons, gypsies, queens, and whales
And treasure isles, and distant shores
Where smugglers rowed with muffled oars,
And pirates wearing purple pants,
And sailing ships and elephants,
And cannibals crouching 'round the pot,
Stirring away at something hot.
(It smells so good, what can it be?
Good gracious, it's Penelope.)

The younger ones had Beatrix Potter
With Mr. Tod, the dirty rotter,
And Squirrel Nutkin, Pigling Bland,
And Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle and-
Just How The Camel Got His Hump,
And How the Monkey Lost His Rump,
And Mr. Toad, and bless my soul,
There's Mr. Rat and Mr. Mole-
Oh, books, what books they used to know,
Those children living long ago!

So please, oh please, we beg, we pray,
Go throw your TV set away,
And in its place you can install
A lovely bookshelf on the wall.

Then fill the shelves with lots of books,
Ignoring all the dirty looks,
The screams and yells, the bites and kicks,
And children hitting you with sticks-

Fear not, because we promise you
That, in about a week or two
Of having nothing else to do,
They'll now begin to feel the need
Of having something to read.

And once they start -- oh boy, oh boy!
You watch the slowly growing joy
That fills their hearts. They'll grow so keen
They'll wonder what they'd ever seen
In that ridiculous machine,
That nauseating, foul, unclean,
Repulsive television screen!

And later, each and every kid
Will love you more for what you did.