My oh my. I just received an interesting snark.
It seems someone read one of my WND columns from two years ago entitled What Is a Socialist? (I'll pause while you go read it.) Then he sent the following:
You're excerpt on socialism that I've posted below [this included most of the body of the column] is disgusting. Way to bend every little fact you can find to your bias. All you're doing is holding back the progression of mankind.
Wow. Little ol' me, single-handedly holding back the progression of mankind! Imagine that. Can someone please explain to me HOW, precisely, I'm achieving that end?
As with most snarks, the critic is long on name-calling and short on actual data to back up his claims that I'm bending every little fact I can find to suit my bias. Doubtless this reader is totally, completely, and utterly free from any progressive bias, no?
In fact, I think this reader is a genius. In a few short lines, he managed to illustrate to an exceptional degree the very points I raised in my column. That takes sheer brilliance.