Country Living Series

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Prayers for Brussels

Horrifying. Prayers for the victims.

14 comments:

  1. This is another hideously inhuman act of murder. I pray it enlightens those who continue to discount, diminish, enable or pretend to ignore the threats associated with our open borders and the rampant uncontrolled invasion taking place there.

    Moreover, I pray it further steels the resolve of the ever-growing number of Americans committed to the restoration of national security sanity and a return to the rule of law.

    I feel particularly sorry for the employees of American Airlines. History shows they've born more than their share of the brunt of such terror attacks in the past, presumably because of their corporate name.

    Thank you, Patrice, for posting this, sad as it is.

    Thoughts and prayers for the victims and their families. Likewise for the strength, success, safety, resources and guidance of all anti-terror and emergency personnel, law enforcement and medical personnel and every other responder, all of whose skills, talents and resources are just so very vital to us all, no matter where in the world we are. Today it's Brussels.

    A. McSp

    ReplyDelete
  2. This could have been prevented. It was a predictable act and it was predicted. Many people here, in Europe and Canada have been warning about unlimited and uncontrolled immigration of Muslims. They understand that a certain percentage of these immigrants can never and will never assimilate even after generations. And a larger percentage while they may not become terrorist will support radical Islam either with money, encouragement or their silence. When more is known you will see that there were many in Brussels who were aware of the terrorists in their midst. They remain silent because their first allegiance is to their religion and their fellow Muslims and never to their adopted country. This will get worse. Sooner or later they will get the really big weapon, a nuke maybe or nerve agent. Sooner or later they will take out an entire Western city, Paris, London, NY City. What then? Surprise that they really do mean to kill us all?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's all so heartbreaking. This most recent terror attack has to make one wonder, how long. How long will we burn candles, flags at half staff, place flowers at the carnage site and make signs of solidarity. How long will the people be called racist, bigots and phobic of every name for raising an angry voice at the bloodshed of their brother and sisters. How long should our TOLERANCE last, from Munich 1972 till the next bomb blast?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The world changed on 9/11. Yet few Americans know the truth about 9/11. Millions don’t want to know. Ridiculous you say? OK, ask your family two questions. Question #1: ‘How many towers collapsed on 9/11?’ Question #2: ‘What caused the towers to collapse? Like good little sheep, they believe that 2 towers collapsed due to fire.

    Satan loves two things, deceit and the shedding of innocent blood. 9/11 gave him both.

    Deceit: Over 2,400 architects and engineers (including myself) demand an investigation as to whether explosives caused the destruction of all 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers. Yes, THREE skyscrapers. Ref: http://www.ae911truth.org/

    Innocent Blood: 9/11 has been used to justify 15 more years of perpetual unconstitutional wars, invasions, occupations and overthrow of sovereign Muslim nations. American military drones kill innocent Muslims every day. How did Christians become so blood thirsty? How would YOU feel if another country murdered your innocent Mother, Father, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles; bombed your hospitals, your family while attending funerals of loved ones murdered. How would you fight back? More innocent blood was shed in Brussels. More is coming. It will be coming to American soil. You see, it is personal now.
    Montana Guy

    ReplyDelete
  5. This strange belief that we attacked ourselves on 9/11 is sick.
    https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-ae911truths-wtc7-explosive-demolition-hypothesis.t1727/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fact: Metabunk.org is administered by a retired video game programmer. Do you seriously believe him over 2,482 degreed architects and engineers? I am sorry but I am not going to be able to help you any further.

      Paul CO, why are you implying that I denied that two airplanes hit 2 of the 3 towers? And why try to discredit my opinion and professional qualification by associating me with moon landings? Let's cut to the chase Paul. How many engineers and architects have you on public record as to supporting the government's findings? I verified with a link to 2,482 names and their professional qualification. Please do the same.
      Montana Guy

      Delete
    2. Your 'logic' in believing 2,482 architects couldn't be wrong is a fallacy appeal to authority. Of course they are wrong. Why are they wrong? Because as we all know (all thinking humans) the terrorists did indeed hit the buildings with planes, we all saw it. The terrorists did indeed do this in secrecy, no one but themselves and a few supporters knew about it. And it is incredibly illogical that somehow we (or someone) loaded a massive amount of explosives into building 7 (or any of the buildings) in gleeful anticipation that someday some terrorist would fly a plane into the building and then THEY could set off the explosives to drop building 7 (or whatever building(s) you think we/they/someone blew up. Where is your common sense man??? You are way to naive and gullible.

      Delete
  6. Agreed. Several years after 9/11 I was able to attend a talk given by one of the govt's 9/11 investigators. There is quite a bit of evidence (aside from the eye witnesses and video) that 9/11 was exactly as reported - planes flying into buildings.

    Thinking it was an inside job is just ridiculous. Unless, of course, you think that the moon landings were staged as well. And that was thoroughly debunked also...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Last April we were in Brussels and, while walking through the busy city center, discussed that the city could well be a target for terrorists - so busy, so vital, full of people, full of beautiful buildings, with its EU connections...and now it has happened. I feel sick to my heart of the terorrists' callous disregard of human life and decency. I am very mch aware that most Muslims do not support terrorism, but the question that has to be asked and answered is: Why is it that 3rd generation Muslim immigrants end up as suicide bombers.What happens? How can this be stopped? European politicians, I fear, still think that more integrative measures will do the trick...I'm not convinced.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I apologize if I made anyone uncomfortable. To begin to accept the possibility that other groups were involved in 9/11 is absolutely frightening. It is like challenging one to question their fundamental beliefs in man, their country and the world. Denial is probably the most primitive psychological defense and the one most likely to kick in when our beliefs are challenged.

    For me, being an engineer, the third skyscraper kept gnawing at me. The #7 World Trade Center tower was not hit by a plane. No impact. No jet fuel. It was built in compliance with very demanding NYC building codes. This massive 47-story building was the first and ONLY steel-frame skyscraper in history to collapse solely from fire. Wow. Yet the 9/11 Commission Report does not even mention its existence or collapse. Fifteen years of war have been largely justified by what we were told. Is it possible that we were not told the truth?
    Montana Guy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will give you the benefit of the doubt, even though I do not agree that there were 'other groups' involved. But without exception everyone who makes these claims dances around the issue and does the "wink, wink, nudge, nudge" thing. Some mysterious "other groups" did it. Or George Bush/Bill Clinton were warned or the ATF or CIA or Israel. If you think you actually know who did it than tell us without going into 10,000 words who it was. But as soon as you start dancing and claiming you can't tell us or you would have to kill us you lose all credibility.

      Building 7 had literally 100's of tons of debris fall on it severely weakening the structure. From the moment the rescuers got into the area they were aware that build 7 was damaged, listing and making groaning noises. Engineers warned it was at risk of collapse. It collapsed. No one blew it up or went in and cut the foundation.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous, I wish a Cliff Notes version of 9/11 was available. Unfortunately a scientific-based engineering and architectural analysis of what caused the collapse of 3 skyscrapers is not that simple. In fact it was never done by the 9/11 Commission. For example, they deliberately avoided investigation into why the strong steel frames below the impact and fire areas lost their strength and gave way as completely and quickly as they did. Steel melts at 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit. Yet the Commission refused to even investigate hard evidence that temperatures exceeded 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit. Does that sound right to you?

      I invite all Cowboys and Cowgirls in the Redoubt to a Film Premier by the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in concert with the Firefighters for 9/11 Truth & Unity. Their Pacific Northwest Tour starts in April. There will be film showings at 3 locations in Idaho and 7 in Montana. You heard the 9/11 Commission’s side. Now hear what 2,482 degreed architects and engineers have to say.

      Details at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qtieb5hspa9wpd/PRESS%20RELEASE%20-%20AE911Truth%20Northwest%20Tour%202016-FINAL3_(LINKED).pdf?dl=0

      Montana Guy

      Delete
    3. Steel melts at 2800 degrees but loooong before that temperature is reached steel loses all it strength. You don't have to be a metallurgist or blacksmith to know this. Once the structure failed where the planes hit and the fires destroyed the integrity of the steel beams the weight of the building above began to obey the law of gravity and there was no man made design that would have stopped it. Any structure depends upon rigidity of it's structural members to remain upright. The strength of most mmaterial is strongest under compression. Once the structure bent those heat weakened beams they couldn't support the 100's perhaps 1000's of tons above them. What we all saw is exactly what you would expect to see.

      Delete