Country Living Series

Saturday, March 17, 2018

Raising boys to be husbands

Here's my WND column for this weekend, originally titled "Raising boys to be husbands" but re-christened "Nine qualities your future son-in-law must have." I certainly don't mind that the editors retitled it -- especially since they put it on the front-page slider.


For those unable to access the WND website, here's the text of the column:

Raising Boys to be Husbands

Several years ago I read an article entitled “How to Raise the Men We'd Want to Marry.” The article describes how a woman raised her son to be a sensitive, nurturing soul who wasn’t afraid to show emotions. Clearly this woman did a fine job raising her boy – particularly as she apparently did so singlehandedly, since the boy’s father is not mentioned anywhere in the article.

Does this mean I’d want this woman’s son to marry one of my daughters? Probably not. I found the article to be just a touch bit heavy on new-age claptrap, emphasizing the feelings and emotions of boys at the expense of what woman might actually want in a future husband and as the father of her children. Feeeelings are fine, but too often they don’t translate into husband material.

Please don’t misunderstand; I am not suggesting we don’t permit boys to express feelings and emotions (and I’m certain many critics will conclude I’m saying just that). But at what point does a boy’s rough-and-tumble nature supersede his mother’s preference for feeeelings? What does his dad have to say about it?

A boy needs lots of emotional nurturing from his mother when he’s young. But as he grows up, he naturally gravitates away from his mother’s cuddles and embraces toward the more manly example set by other men. He’s less interested in “talking about his feelings” than he is engaging in farting contests with his friends.

So anyway, this whole line of thought started me thinking about how I would want a boy to be raised if he was going to marry one of my daughters. What qualities do I admire in a man? Here’s a partial list, in no particular order (friends will recognize my husband in this list):

Humor. My husband is funny. Hilariously funny. There are times he has me in stitches as he imitates accents or tells a story with added melodrama or otherwise finds the more amusing side of life. Humor can get you through the darkest and most uncertain of times.

Morals. Men should have high moral standards. These standards will translate into proper fatherly authority and guidance for his children.

Warriors. Men should be warriors. I don't mean all men should be soldiers or police officers; I mean a man should be ready, able, and willing to defend his family under whatever circumstances arise. The defense could be as low-key as words (telling his mother to stop picking on his wife) or as dire as shooting an intruder who is threatening his family.

A work ethic. A man, my husband tells me, should be able to provide for his family. His opinion is not that women shouldn’t work outside the home – quite the contrary – but that women shouldn’t have to work because the man is too lazy to get off his duff and find a job, any job, to make ends meet. A man takes pride in doing whatever lowly job is necessary to provide income for his family.

Gentleness. A man should be strong enough to be gentle, and I don’t mean “gentle” in the feminine sense. I mean, a man should know how to convince others through his words and honorable actions, not through sheer strength or violence (unless the situation calls for it, of course). He should know how to discipline his children, not beat them. He should know how to disagree with his wife in a respectful way, not with fury or (God forbid) with force. A man should be strong enough to admit when he’s wrong, and strong enough to be gracious when others admit they're wrong.

Faith. A man should have faith. A man should be strong enough to know he is weak and flawed, and where to turn to remedy that. A man with faith guides his family toward God.

Practical knowledge. A man should have practical knowledge – just like a woman should have practical knowledge. My husband can turn his hand to any number of tasks that need doing – he can wire a house, replace leaky plumbing, build sheds and barns, cut firewood with a chainsaw, and other manly activities.

The Head. A man should be the Head of the household. A lot of modern women take exception to that term, somehow seeing it as demeaning or insulting. By contrast, I see it as comforting and loving. I am the Heart of this household, and as everyone knows, a body is no good without a heart, just as a body is no good without a head. We need both, and the fact that I view my husband as my Head in no way diminishes my importance as his Heart. But someone has to have the final say in a house for peace and order to prevail, and God in His infinite wisdom ordained that job to go to the man.

Smart women pick men who truly understand what being “the Head” means. Remember the Laura Ingalls Wilder books? Laura admired the way her parents worked together. I once saw it written that Caroline went wherever Charles took her, but Charles would only go where Caroline let him. In other words, being the Head of a household doesn’t mean being a nasty dictator. In means taking wise counsel from others, primarily one’s Heart, to discern the best path for a family to take. An important task for a woman in choosing a husband is to pick a man who truly understands what it means to take his place as Head of the household.

Respect. A man should respect his wife – but that’s easier said than done unless a wife respects her husband. A woman should never emasculate her man by nagging or complaining about him to her friends. (It drives me nuts to hear women trash-talk their husbands.)

The article referenced at top was written by a feminist, for feminists. She raised her son to support feminist ideals. So while the qualities of “empathy” and “being good listeners” and “expressing feelings” listed in the article (all feminine attributes, I might add) might be a plus, do women want girly-men as husbands?

Feminists might. I’m just glad my husband isn’t one of them. I’d far rather have a funny guy who can fix a sink than a sensitive guy who weeps at chick flicks. I’m just weird that way.

9 comments:

  1. I love you head and heart analogy! Keep up the good work

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now we need an article on raising women to be good wives. How to let that man be a good husband, because of course a marriage doesn't need two husbands, like the feminists think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. That was my comment. Women, in general, raise the children. If there are any complaints, women need to start being and raising good wives and mothers.

      Delete
  3. I looked for ‘her’ for seven years. Along the way the best advice was gleaned from eHarmony (whom I give credit but not endorsement). They recommended that BEFORE dating, folks create two lists. One of ‘Must Haves’ (like Patrice’s), the other ‘Must Avoids’. For me obvious failure of a potential mate to must meet ANY ONE criteria would be a deal-breaker. Sorry but no ‘I’ll marry her and surely I change her later’. With proper vetting many deal-breakers can be revealed BEFORE investing valuable time and emotional capital.

    Two of my ‘Must Haves’ were believing that Jesus Christ is man’s only Savior and that the only lawful civil government is that ordained by God. Two of my ‘Must Avoids’ were being enamored of city life and smart phone-addicted. Just those four criteria narrowed the field significantly. Finally after seven years I basically gave up and moved to the Redoubt along with my church group. Yep, you guessed it. Within a year I met ‘her’ and knew it in very short time. And guess where she came from. Yep, my former state. Happiness is being ‘equally yoked’.

    If you got this far I apologize for the longggg comment.

    Dock Guy

    ReplyDelete
  4. That is an awesome article. I sent it to my newly married son. He comes from a home where the dad is the head of the home and married a girl where the mom is. They will work it out but I think there will be a few years of struggle along the learning curve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Strange that he would seek a mate from a home in complete disobedience to God if he was raised in a home in obedience to God. Bad idea.

      Delete
  5. Well and darn well said. Good stuff.

    Huggs...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don’t know exactly how to say what I want to. On the whole, I like your list better. But.

    Stoicism and, I guess, machismo were two of the things I screened out in mate selection. Stoicism because I saw so many of the men in my family end up with their mental health seriously damaged by the fact that any display of emotion other than anger was verboten. I remember my father being mocked mercilessly for crying, for talking about being lonely, for declaring his love openly. My grandparents made a conscious decision not to let me be raised that way after it drove Grandpa to a nervous breakdown, and I made a conscious decision not to select a mate who would run a household that way.

    Machismo, I don’t know what to say about. It just— disgusts me. It’s NOT the same thing as masculinity, although the two seem to be treated as interchangable. I guess my husband’s friend (mine, too, actually) put it best when he told me that “A MAN leads his family, and he doesn’t need to prove it or demand dominance. A BOY shows off how tough and dominant he is, and forces people to obey him.”

    I heard, over and over and over again, that Daddy was a pussy, a faggot, not a real man. Yet reason and the good of the family guided the vast majority of his decisions. My FIL, on the other hand, always thought of himself as “MANLY.” Yet decisions were usually about what HE WANTED, and if unquestioning compliance wasn’t given, he would either hurt you or threaten to until he got his way. To me, that seems like the behavior of an ill-parented pubescent boy in a big body. He might have “won” more often than Daddy did. He might have been more successful as a warlord. But he destroyed the people around him. It’s taken 20 years to build my husband up from the broken-spirited boy he concealed under humor when he was young. His daughters will NEVER be healthy women; one demands to wear all the pants in town and the other is a battered woman. His other son credits the Army with saving his life.

    What’s the difference between “macho” and “masculine”?? I’d really like to be sure. Our son is ten. I hope we’re teaching him to be a MAN. Not a tyrant who cannot take advice from a mere woman or hear the thoughts of a mere child, and not an emasculated wreck.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's ok for men to cry after watching, "Field of Dreams". Anything else is suspect.

    ReplyDelete