Country Living Series

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Aborting boys because you hate men

Here's my WND column for this weekend entitled Aborting Boys Because You Hate Men.


It's hard to describe the red-hot fury I felt as I wrote this. Some people think the blog post on which it was based is a hoax; but you know what? Even if it is, the sentiments still ring true.

18 comments:

  1. maybe it is a hoax , but I heard same sentiments about 7 years ago from a relative...that mother did not go through with it , now it is a case of explaining that everything" male" the child does is normal and not something to be "fixed". Hey, they kill off girls in other countries for the same reasoning , why wouldn't it be the same here now that "we are no longer a Christian nation", we have "evolved " into brutes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are missing the mark here. Feminism hates WOMEN. It desires to destroy the femine. It's targets are daughter, wife, mother and sister. Feminism is the equivalent of gas lighting your enemy until they commit suicide. ...while they think your their best friend because you helped pull the trigger. That women is a monster....what feminism wants her to become. A murderer instead of a Mother. A slut instead of a Wife. A victim instead of a daughter. An enemy instead of a Sister.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know, that's probably the truth. I can't think of anything, in all the world, more misogynistic than ripping the living child out of a woman's body, or telling her that the things her body is built to do are useless and worthless and bad, or telling her that the greatest possible measure of human worth she can achieve is to be indistinguishable from a man...

      And then tell a man that the greatest thing HE can do is be more like a woman...

      Almost as if they're trying to make us into standardized, interchangeable parts.

      OH, WAIT!!!!

      Delete
    2. You do not know a lot about feminism, do you.

      Delete
  3. I really, really, really hope that's a hoax. Or satire.

    I hate to think of anyone walking around that pathetically brittle, self-righteous, and mentally ill.

    People like that probably need to be controlled by a loving patriarchy (I guess a matriarchy would do) for their own darn good.

    And I like my measure of autonomy, and want to keep it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely. This is what "the left" defends... tooth and nail? Wow, it really is a brave new world isn't it. Totally depraved is what I call it and I think God would as well! May God have mercy on her soul! Not unless she repents though. Sure of that by any measure....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1 to anon @ 1:36pm

      "May God have mercy on her soul".

      I hope she gets it somewhere as I'm finding it difficult to wish her anything but a speedy decent down the same toilet as her murdered/butchered son.

      Delete
    2. I am by no means leftist, but this - aborting fetuses based on their sex - is certainly NOT what "the left" defends - this reeks of a rather tiny subset of lunatic fringe people and a lot of youthful lunacy caused by inexperience and some years of brainwashing.

      Delete
    3. Anon 1:36 pm on Feb. 14th.... I did not say this represented all of the left. But, this does beg the question. Why do they defend abortion all the way to birth? It is likely that they do not see their seed as human, even some of the left espouse taking the life of infants up to a year or so. Yup! That is the "brave new world" we live in.

      Why are dead babies discovered in restrooms of grocery stores and walk marts? Why are babies abandoned shortly after birth if they escape the abortion butchers? It is because we have as a society so abandoned decency and morality that life means nothing unless it is convenient or wanted. This is leftist and socialist thought run amok.

      Yes, I do not wish the woman to die a horrible death like her unborn son. Is that right? I am not her judge or executioner. She will have to answer for her actions to a righteous God who will judge her. Sorry for that is the facts. I truly hope this story is not true, but it does ring true with far left thought and philosophy.

      Delete
  5. I don't know if the blog was a hoax but I read the story on a major news site. I am just flummoxed by the hate, and the idiotic reasoning. Whether I agreed or not I had a certain amount of respect for feminists back in the day and I am grateful for those who worked for me to have the right to vote etc. but the big thing these days for feminists is their reproductive organs. How would the Susan B Anthonys view today's shallow, callow young woman whose sexual escapades must never lead to any consequences, and must always involve an evil male who looked at her wrong? Can anyone read something like this and not be appalled and hope it is a sick prank or a cry for attention and not real life? ...climbing off the soap box - how sad for her either way!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kathy, feminists did not work for your right to do anything. They worked to remove the rights of both women and men. Land owners had the right to vote because they were the ones paying the taxes. Women have always worked. Some of them were given the freedom to be provided for by their husbands. Read actual history and look around you. Feminist clearly stated that they did not want women to have the choice between staying home and being provided for and working because they would not choose to work. A women murdering her baby because she CLAIMS a man said something that upset her is the self indulgent, monstrous, evil fruit of the feminist that you think you owe the right to vote to. What you have is 50 million murdered babies, rampant stds, female teachers raping their male students, an economy beyond fixing and men running the other way regarding marriage. You owe them your disgust which is exactly what thinking women of great intellectual capacity had for the bitter, ugly women who did nothing more but attempt to force everyone into their misery by claiming it was freedom to be unloved and liberty to be used.

      Delete
    2. Carlotta, I suppose most feminists would be very surprised about all that power they are supposed of have. Come on. This is still a culture in which you unthinkingly suppose a woman who supports feminism must be "bitter, ugly" and you really believe that feminism has destroyed the economy?

      You should really read up on feminism, there is such a variety of feminist voices over the decades - you have those who thought women should not work outside the home; you have those who thought women should have that choice. But what feminists tended to agree on was that men had too much power over women (whose legal status was inferior, as we all know, who were economically dependent) and that this should be changed, because too much power turns people into tyrants and because women who did not have loving, respectful husbands could be abused far too easily. Besides, women who did not fit within the traditional framework of being a wife and mother (because their husbands had died and left them penniless, for instance) had an extremely difficult time providing for their children.
      There is certainly a lunatic fringe among feminists, as there is in every political movement, ideology or faith. But even if there is a tiny faction of evil manhating extremists among feminists, their actual influence and power is negligible.

      Delete
    3. Anon
      I was a feminist. You are either willfully ignorant of the evil you defend or evil yourself.

      Attempting to appeal to emotions doesn't work. I have stated fact. You haven't. Move along.

      Delete
  6. Yes, I do agree that "women's lib" has done a great deal for women. I treasure the right to own property in my own name (something American women 200 years ago did not possess), to retain custody of my children if my spouse should pass away (something my grandmother had to fight tooth and nail for just in the 1960s), the right to vote (surely I don't have to date that one), the right to hold a job outside the home and continue to work after marriage should I choose to do so (something my grandmother had in theory but not in practice), having it be illegal for my husband to beat me, instead of merely distasteful (or commended)... There's a pretty long list there.

    At the same time, I'm fed up with being called lazy or worthless or a traitor to the cause because I chose to stay home and raise my kids. Fed up with being treated, by women and men alike, as if I must of necessity be either a bloodsucker or someone who chose slavery and deserves no better. Fed up with not being able to stand up for myself without being called "a feminazi and a bitch," and at the same time not being able to compromise or give him his way at other times without being called "a spineless, subservient doormat."

    I'm tired of having my children (of which Hubby and I have four) looked at as unfortunate by-products of sexual intercourse, as if one of us must have been too stupid to use the birth control correctly.

    I understand what the first, and even the second, wave of feminists did for me.

    I also understand what the third wave has cost me, and what it has cost my husband, and what it stands to cost my daughters and my son. I've had enough.

    ReplyDelete
  7. CFebruary 15, 2015 at 1:54 PM

    Yes, I do agree that "women's lib" has done a great deal for women. I treasure the right to own property in my own name (something American women 200 years ago did not possess), to retain custody of my children if my spouse should pass away (something my grandmother had to fight tooth and nail for just in the 1960s), the right to vote (surely I don't have to date that one), the right to hold a job outside the home and continue to work after marriage should I choose to do so (something my grandmother had in theory but not in practice), having it be illegal for my husband to beat me, instead of merely distasteful (or commended)... There's a pretty long list there.


    @MC

    And not a one in your list is true.

    This is what happens when a country substitutes lifetime movies for actual historical research.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I understand what the first, and even the second, wave of feminists did for me.

    @MC
    No. Clearly you don't. They set you up and you walked into their trap. The third wave simply took the mask off.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Heck, if nothing will do you but to kill your children...why do it before they are born...wait until they are teenagers...it would add so much more meaning to it!

    ReplyDelete