Country Living Series

Friday, October 16, 2009

With friends like this, who needs public servants?

Hey, I want servants too! No fair!

Comments I received along with this link:

Let me see now. 24 servants for Michelle, 35 (approx.) czars for the President to help hi-jack our country. That's 59 folks the Obama's are keeping from the unemployment lines, and we have the honor of being able to pay for them. We should all be able to sleep better tonight knowing we are doing our fair share to make their life a little more bearable. $1.571 million!!!

There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the President's own pocket.

Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and "First Hairstylist" Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One to Europe.

Yes, I know, The Canadian Free Press has to publish this because the USA media is too scared they might be considered racist. Sorry America!


  1. I love your website and visit it regularly. I just had to point out though, that as much as I dislike the Obama's agenda, that news article is misleading at best, and completely lying at worst. Mrs. Obama does not have the most assistants ever. If you research it a little you will find that it is not true that Laura Bush and Jackie Kennedy only had one assistant, in fact it's rediculous to even consider them only having one assistant in this day and age. I never thought I'd be defending the Obama's, but I have a great respect for you and your family, and I'm sure you wouldn't want such obviously unresearched information on your website.

  2. So exactly how many assistants does she have? How many did Laura Bush and Jackie Kennedy have? And what were your sources?

    A Different Anonymous

  3. I find it telling that, after nine months, the first anonymous hasn't responded with his/her sources.